Appointment of the Governor

Q.  Which of the following is/are true regarding the appointment of the Governor?

1) Feature of appointing the Governor has been taken from the Irish Constitution.
2) Constitution provides only 2 qualifications for a person who can be appointed as a Governor.

- Published on 06 Mar 17

a. Only 1
b. Only 2
c. Both 1 and 2
d. Neither 1 nor 2

ANSWER: Only 2
 
  • Pattern of government in the states is similar to that of the Centre.

  • Part 6 of the Constitution, dealing with government of the states, is not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir (it has separate state constitution).

  • Articles 153 to 167 in Part 6 of the Constitution deal with the State Executive.

  • The state executive consists of the Governor, the Chief Minister, the Council of Ministers and the Advocate General of the state.

  • The office of governor has a dual role - as an agent of the Central Government and as Chief Executive head of the state.

  • However, he is a nominal executive head (titular or constitutional head).

  • The 7th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1956 facilitated the appointment of the same person as a governor for two or more states.

  • Appointment -

  • The governor is not elected.

  • He is appointed by the president by warrant under his hand and seal.

  • Appointing the Governor by the President is a feature adopted from the Canadian Constitution.

  • He is sort of a nominee of the Central Government.

  • But, as observed by Supreme Court in 1979, the office of governor of a state is not an employment under the Central government.

  • It is an independent constitutional office.

  • It is not under the control of or subordinate to the Central Government.

  • Constituent Assembly chose for the present system of appointment of because -

  • The mode of direct election can create conflicts between the Governor and the Chief Minister.

  • Being only a constitutional (nominal) head, there is no point in making arrangements for his election and spending huge amount of money.

  • The election of a Governor would be entirely on personal issues.

  • An elected Governor would belong to a party and would not be a neutral and an impartial head.

  • The election of Governor would create separatist tendencies and thus affect the political stability and unity of the country.

  • Presidential nomination helps the Centre to maintain its control over the states.

  • The direct election of the Governor creates a serious problem of leadership during general election in the state.

  • The Chief Minister would like his nominee to contest for governorship.

  • Thus, a lesser than best man of the ruling party would be elected as Governor.

  • Qualifications in Constitution for the appointment of a person as a governor -

  • He should be a citizen of India.

  • He should have completed the age of 35 years.

  • In addition to this, 2 conventions have also developed.

  • One is that he should bean outsider, that is, he should not belong to the state where he is appointed.

  • This makes him free from the local politics.

  • Second is that while appointing the Governor, the President is needed to consult the Chief Minister of the state concerned.

  • This will ensure that the constitutional machinery in the state functions smoothly.

Post your comment / Share knowledge


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above image, reload the page to generate a new one.)