Article 18 deals with Abolition of titles
Q. Which of the following is/are true?
1) Article 17 deals with abolition of titles.
2) Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan and Padma Sri cannot be used as suffixes or prefixes to the names of awardees.- Published on 21 Feb 17a. Only 1
b. Only 2
c. Both 1 and 2
d. Neither 1 nor 2
ANSWER: Only 2
- Article 18 abolishes titles.
It also makes 4 provisions -
(a) It prohibits the state from conferring any title (except a military or academic distinction) on anybody, whether a citizen or a foreigner.
(b) It prohibits a citizen of India from accepting any title from any foreign state.
(c) A foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the state cannot accept any title from any foreign state without the consent of the president.
(d) No citizen or foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the State is to accept any present, emolument or office from or under any foreign State without the consent of the president.
- Hereditary titles of nobility like Maharaja, Rai Bahadur, Rai Saheb, Dewan Bahadur etc.. which were conferred by colonial States are banned as these are against the principle of equal status of all.
- In 1996, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the National Awards-Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan and Padma Sri.
- It said that these awards do not amount to ‘titles’ within the meaning of Article 18 that prohibits only hereditary titles of nobility.
- They do not violate Article 18 as the theory of equality does not mandate that merit should not be recognized.
- But, they should not be used as suffixes or prefixes to the names of awardees. Otherwise, the awardees should forfeit the awards.
- These National Awards were instituted in 1954.
- The Janata Party government headed by Morarji Desai discontinued them in 1977. But they were again revived in 1980 by the Indira Gandhi government.
