Do You Support Internment?
Do You Support Internment?
The internment process can be explained as the indefinite detention of an individual by a government. In the process, the individual does not undergo normal legal processes that in normal conditions is the right of any detainee. Internment is considered as must during national emergency like a terrorist attack or wartime so that the dangerous suspects cannot hamper the society. These individuals are detained by the personnel of intelligent security services. The topic is about the human rights which every individual possesses in a democratic country. The debate revolves around two key issues - security and civil liberties. So, let us start the discussion on the topic, Do You Support Internment?
Yes
• The concept does not deny the normal legal process completely. The detainees are given other rights to present their case during the internment process.
• There are certain safeguards built into the internment process so that no innocent is punished. The detainees present their case in front of a tribunal and also have a right to appeal to a higher authority.
• At a time when nation is under threat, the top priority is to protect the intelligence sources rather than going for long trials.
• The rules applied during the peace time may not be justified during wartime and vice versa. At a crucial time, it is important to protect the citizens and take steps that encourage reconstruction process.
No
• No trials for charges mean compromising of the human rights. It indicates that government is not concerned about the rights of people in a democratic country.
• Internment process without trial worsens the opposition of enemies and can be a risk to civilians.
• The war on terror cannot be assigned in the category of armed conflict and therefore, detaining an individual without trial is an unjustified process.
• Detaining the individuals on mere suspect without following a legal process cannot turnaround things and makes the nation safer. It is not essential that the information provided by security intelligence is reliable and accurate.
• Rights a are must for all the individuals otherwise there would be no meaning of democracy. The process weakness the key factors including the presumption of innocence and habeas corpus.
Conclusion
It is important to make an appropriate balance between rights and freedom. No one can deny the importance of protecting liberties and rights but it should not come at any cost. The government should protect the nation by taking proper accountable measures. If it fails, the voters can hold it accountable for the wrong decisions.
Discussion
- RE: Do You Support Internment? -Deepa Kaushik (12/15/14)
- The process of internment may try not to punish the innocent, but we cannot deny the fact that we are taking back the rights of the person who is charged by not providing him any scope for defence. The detainees are also humans and every human life is equally precious, be that be the chairperson, President, Prime Minister or a normal civilian. No life can be valued less in comparison to others.
It is understandable that internment is a process during emergency and crisis situation when we lack quality time for trials. But if we are not competent enough to wrap up the trials in a quick manner, then that should not be reflected on the life of some other individual. Se should try to find the procedures to fasten our legal process to have a verdict at the earliest possible.
Internment definitely needs some sort of amendment especially keeping in mind the human rights and value of life. We cannot abandon the internment process all together, as the process and procedures definitely would change their course at the emergency situation. We cannot expect a similar trial as during peace time during the internment. Yet, we can try to improvise the legal procedure to provide better brackets for the charged individuals to produce their stand.