Would you have returned your award to protest?

Would you have returned your award to protest?

Introduction:

Writers, poets, filmmakers have joined hands in protesting against instances of rising intolerance in our country and their weapon of protest is not the age old Anshan or the trendy social media trolling but a weapon that only prominent people can have access to – they are returning national and government accorded awards. Recently scientist P M Bhargava also joined the league when she returned the prestigious Padma Bhushan. The list has gone up fast to 44 Sahitya Akedemi Awards, 10 National Film Awards and 2 Padma Awards till date. The murder of rationalist M M Kalburgi is one of the incidents that provoked these intellectuals to start their silent way of protest. A man killed in UP over allegations that he ate beef and other incidents where leftists took to their hands to impose their moral policing over people also added fire to the protest.

However, is returning awards and honors that were accorded to them for their good work and by the love of people the right way to protest?

Yes:

1. This is a fight for freedom of speech and against growing intolerance in our country. As writers, poets and filmmakers, they should rightly consider these as their greatest tools. We cannot imagine how a writer or poet would love doing what they do best if their freedom to express what they believe in is taken away from them. How can a filmmaker continue to show us daring stories like Haider if his freedom of expression is curtailed only to the extent of appeasing those in power?

2. We cannot revoke freedom to think differently from someone else and still expect a country to take the road to development. When people are punished, murdered and endangered for having a different point of view and the government acts indifferent on the matter, it is no more a democracy to live in. Citizens and scholars have a right to ask for protection from the government when they are threatened by leftists and gets killed one unfortunate day.

3. This is a silent protests from people who have earned the highest dignity and they are doing something that would make the government think harder upon the matter and act on it. These scholars are prominent citizens of our country and they take it as their duty to show the power holders that India can no more be divided over communalism and ideology. If the government is sensible enough it should not take long for them to get the point and start taking actions against the evil creeping in our backyard.

4. This is an ideological fight in disguise of a literary fight. India has applauded rationalist writers like Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasrin when they were fighting for their views as opposed to a particular community. Writers in Bangladesh are facing life threats and are being killed for expressing their views as opposed to the orthodox. What difference would it make if we stay silent on what is slowing brewing in India to take the shape of total intolerance for others?

5. The Sahitya Akedemi, based at Ravindra Bhavan in New Delhi is in memorial of Rabindranath Tagore who is known for his fearless literary works like the verses of “where the mind is without fear” but the Akademi was silent over the murder of Sahitya laureate. This dismayed many writers and they took it to them to return the award if their freedom of speech is not to be protected.

6. It has been 2 months since the murder of Kalburgi and police is yet to find a lead in this case. The probe started with a lot of misleads like the reason why his security was withdrawn and the missing CCTV footage that was later recovered.

No:

1. The Karnataka state government is in charge of the probe and murder investigation of the Kalburgi murder case according to our laws that cite the rules for interferences of the centre on the state. Despite this fact, the scholars and artists have gone on to blame the Modi government of being biased towards the evil deeds of the leftist wings and extremists to whom the party is allied. Returning awards is not the solution to bring in tolerance and freedom of speech.

2. Just because Kalburgi spoke against idolatry and was threatened by the ring-wing Hindutva groups often, doesn’t make them the convict of the case until evidences point in their directions. It would be wrong to be judgemental of the central government and return awards.

3. The Home Minister has been inviting these scholars and intellectuals to meet the PM and other prominent members of the centre and establish ways to stop intolerance. The government is seeking suggestions that would make the situation safer for writers and others but instead our scholars have chosen to declare PM as the sole convict for dividing people over communalism and entertaining intolerance due to the involvement of his allies.

4. Just as actor Kamal Hassan has stated, returning awards is a futile attempt to stop the growth of intolerance. The protest by these successful people have been directed towards one party which is wrong.

Politics has always used the weapon of divide and rule no party is clean of it. These intellectuals should rather debate on the rising intolerance with eminent leaders and suggest ways to curb it.

5. Whether or not these scholars should return their awards to protest against growing intolerance is entirely their own choice but they must not forget that those awards and honors were given to them with a lot of cheers and support from people whose lives and hearts their works touched. Returning awards is plainly disrespecting these people.

Conclusion:

Cases of intolerance and dying freedom of speech can take our country back to the darkness of the days when wars prevailed over communalism and fight for superiority.

These scholars, filmmakers, scientists and others who have been given highest accords are powerful and strong people who should rather be framing suggestions and debates with the government instead of choosing the silent protest form of way.

Tolerance and respect for each other can only prevail when people are willing to talk about it and not just accuse each other.

Making intolerance a political agenda and fighting for it among ourselves rather than finding out the solutions will lead only to the loss of India as a whole.
Post your comment

    Discussion

  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -Kshitij (12/14/15)
  • I don't think it is a wise option to protest against any happening.All the matter was under state gov.and the investigations are going on.So there is no point of blaming central gov. for all this what happened it is all just to defame the central gov.And as per my opinion no one should return there award,as what they have got is there hard work,there talent,there creativity and they should not raise question over there talent,this is all just a political gimmick,nothing else.
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -Vaibhav (11/20/15)
  • So, returning an award is a personal choice IMO but making a mountain out of a molehill should be avoided. If you are upset and you really feel this is the only way you can register your protest, then its ok but is it really necessary to call a press conference after every award return. It feels like they are trying to feed all this negativity to the media and our very smart media publishes and telecasts every story without checking anything. I am all up for peaceful protest which in a democratic country like us is very necessary, but various mediums are already defined in our democracy to register the protest.
    People need to see the bigger picture. Like after every terrorist attacks we say that we should showcase our unity to outside world, why cant we show the same kind of attitude here. We should understand that activities like these are creating a bad name for the country that and too in the moment when India is on verge of growing unprecedentedly. You may support other ideologies than our PM but as a respect to the chair we should make sure that we provide an environment in which he can attract other investors to invest in India and thus helps toward development.
    So, to answer the given question, I would have returned award if I felt that it is the only way left, but I would have kept media attention etc away from it.
    Thanks.
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -nahida (11/20/15)
  • Mr. suman..... are you mocking my comment? recheck your post please..... it imitates mine
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -suman kumr (11/19/15)
  • returning rewards, creating strikes, sitting at dharnaas, are certainly not the wise way to protest. it do not solve the problems but creates the problems. what we feel is not the social matter, but what the grey matter really is, 'what we do'. what we do will soothen the warm issue or create another burning.? it just reveals our emotional immaturity. returning rewards simply means that we do not love our country and dont respect its blessings that we are rewarded. nation and politics are two different things and applying the old funda to show the baseless wrath is the insult of nation not the government
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -Deepa Kaushik (11/08/15)
  • The National awards or any prestigious awards are given to those who have excelled in their field. The person is not just measured in terms of the subject knowledge, but also on the basis of their popularity amongst the masses. The way of expression when please many minds and rules over their hearts, these people get recognized for their contribution to their field of service and get chosen for the national award.

    Here, the returning of the awards was started by the writers. The Kalburgi murder mystry is yet left clueless. Nothing had been proved to say that it was his expression of speech that led to his end. Still, we cannot forget or deny the fact that he had been threatened for his expressions against idolatry. This very fact hit the writers as their expression of thoughts is getting restricted by a threat to their life.

    When a writer or any other professional is restricted to express their thoughts by a threatening for the life, they can never think out of the way. And when they become one among the herd, there is no scope for any awards. In other words, the awards granted to them are meaningless as they can no longer spread their wings in an unbounded sway.

    The same thought has another angle which connects them to the common man. The awards are a recognition given by commonman who liked their work. It is very much noticed that common man is not happy with the law and order situation in the country and their anger gets multifold aggravated by the silence of the Government on some serious issues hitting hardly in different parts of the country. These return of the awards can be taken as the voice of those many who are influenced byu the different thought of these few prestigious personalities.

    The return of the awards is a symbolised movement which is made in a non-violent way, simultaneously portraying the extent of anger and disgust in the hearts of the citizens of the country. This had been given many directions and meanings by the media by continuously airing the subject and inmcreasing disharmony. It would be better if media just projects the actual situation by not giving air to the flame.

    It is nothing wrong in returning the award. Though the step taken has not hit the Government directly, still the message is very beautifully passed on to the concerned place. It is the individual decision to return the award; and we should accept that returning a national award required big heart, open-mindset and immense courage.
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -Paras (11/06/15)
  • I think this is not a right move by intellectuals like poets, writers etc. To return their award due to growing intolerance. If they feel discontented with the government, they have a very powerful platform to raise their voice i.e their work, their writings. They can come up with a solution against this intolerance because just by returning their awards won't solve this problem.
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -neetesh kurmi (11/05/15)
  • this is totally wrong of returning awards.these are the people who has been opposing modi...they only target him not other party...if they have dare .then go for debate why they are running away from debate n only speaking against him....he is doing nice work n these people don't wanna him to make country develop..they oppose every thing what he does.......after all they are not writer or poet they are the person who wants India not to succed
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -shubhangi (11/05/15)
  • Dear nahida. We dnt have to prove our motion aswe do in debate rather we have to accept other members as well. ?? We
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -nahida (11/05/15)
  • madam shubhangi...!! in a GD , people normally choose one option and express in fact reiterate his point by the logics and analysis. but is not the prerequesite to stick on that option. if you find some analytical supporting facts in other options, you can switch into it, as it shows that you accept the weighted factors and you are not contradicting. but an important thing to weild is that you cannot wander among options, at it shows you are not sure and confident in your ideas, and confused... so mind that sister.....
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -nahida (11/05/15)
  • returning rewards, creating strikes, sitting at dharnaas, are certainly not the wise way to protest. it do not solve the problems but creates the problems. what we feel is not the social matter, but what the grey matter really is, 'what we do'. what we do will soothen the warm issue or create another burning.? it just reveals our emotional immaturity. returning rewards simply means that we do not love our country and dont respect its blessings that we are rewarded. nation and politics are two different things and applying the old funda to show the baseless wrath is the insult of nation not the government
  • RE: Would you have returned your award to protest? -Shubhangi Dubey (11/05/15)
  • Please guide me. In GD is like that if we started speaking in favour of some topic then do we need stick to that motion till end or we need to bring both positive andnegative points of the topic and bring common conclusion.?